• Home
  • About
  • Services
    • Speaking
  • Resources
    • Maiden Frank's Impact Insights
    • Provocateurs not Philanthropists
    • The Provocateurs' Network
  • Contact
  • Product
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
    • Speaking
  • Resources
    • Maiden Frank's Impact Insights
    • Provocateurs not Philanthropists
    • The Provocateurs' Network
  • Contact
  • Product
  MAIDEN MANZANAL-FRANK, GLOBALSTAKES CONSULTING
{menu}
Maiden Frank's Impact Insights

< Back to Resource

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All
    Accountability
    Capacity Building
    Change
    Collaboration
    Communication
    Community
    Connection
    Creativity
    Crisis
    Effectiveness
    Engagement
    Evolution
    Failures
    Global
    Governance
    Ideas
    Impact
    Innovation
    Inter Cultural Intelligence
    Leadership
    Life's Lessons
    Management
    Marketing
    Perspective
    Risks
    Strategy
    Sustainability
    Transparency

Back to Blog

BEWARE: COLLABORATION TRAPS

10/12/2018

 
 
I have sat in numerous collectives, coalitions, and partnership-based initiatives for many years. And while I have seen the great benefits of collaboration work, I also cringed at some of the dysfunction manifested in the name of collaboration. Here are some of the few observations around collaboration that show how  conflicting  motives can hijack its value.
                                                             

​                                                                               

·         Some collectives are not collaboration at all. Some are pseudo-collaborations when they appear in the guise of collaboration but are not. Partnerships that are by nature tactical, one-off, short-term do not have to be labeled collaboration. It is a mere partnership for a specific set of projects, initiatives, and agenda. Collaboration focuses on long-term strategic objectives that no one organization can boast to overcome or solve. For example, eradicating poverty, homelessness, etc.
 
·         For one, when collaboration leads to co-dependencies between organizations, using collaboration partners to fill their capacity deficits and further discourage the organization from actually investing on specific organizational and technical capacity-building because they can get it ‘free’ through collaboration. It sounds pernicious, but this practice is very common.  For example, the convenor will set up a research collective in the hope that the agenda, framework, and technical skills-set drawn from the group-those thing that they lack and cannot do on their own.
 
·         When the convenor abdicates on its responsibilities to the whole group and delegates all the decision making, it makes the group more responsible than they should be. For example, a convenor who is legally responsible for setting the collaboration, having funding to administer and support it, abdicates its leadership role to the Chair, Vice Chair or certain organizations to decide on issues related to its functions.
 
·         The role of the convenor is very tricky. The people in the group look to the convenor for guidance, inspiration, and smooth administration, as well as leadership. When there is no leader or sets of leaders in the group performing complementary functions, it begets the question: who is calling the shots here? How can the decision-makers contain risks in their decision-making?
 
·         Supposedly the risks are shared equally by the whole group, but in fact, risks are shared by those who get to do more work for the group. Leaving some to do less while the rest of the group do more than what they bargained for.  Studies show that the larger the group, slackers tend to arise and create more work for others.
 
·         There seems to be no clarity why organizations and individuals are sitting on these groups and committees regarding their motivation and ‘what’s in it for them?” It is very rare when people get honest about it. Is it to get more funding? More prestige? Getting capacity when there is none in your organization? Is it for a good reputation? Is it because it aligns to your organizations’ purpose? Is it because you get more than you put in? Is it because it is easy to sit in without having more responsibilities?  Being honest and candid about what you want out of these collaborations will give you an assessment in whether or not it is the right fit for your interests and motivations.  It also gives everyone on the table an idea how these interests align with the groups’ aims.
 
·         Simply getting what you want and offering to help is not the answer. Collaboration is not just the sum of all efforts if everyone likes what is going on. Any time, partners can pull out and say “we are not part of this,” because it happens more than you think. The self-interest is too high on the agenda to make it work for the group. Sacrificing your own organization’s self-interest for the collective common good may create a little discomfort or moderate pain as part of the equation, not a lot are prepared or have contemplated this. Ask yourself is being part of the collective enhances your ability to forge common agenda and interests or in short-term merely responding to your needs.
 
These and many more have become perplexing dilemmas. When everyone extols the values of collaboration, the practice of collaboration is nowhere near as impact-full and effectiveness as it should be. And everybody wonders why.
 
A few self-assessment questions will get you thinking about your role in the collaboration framework.  
 
1.       Have you clarified, explained, and demonstrated your motivation, interests, and organizational aims as part of the group?

2.       Have you expressed the opinions, perspectives, and challenges that you face as part of the collective and understood each partner’s interests and motivations?

3.       Have you benefited more than what you are intending to gain as part of the group or vice-versa ( meaning put more than what you expected to contribute?)

4.       Have you contributed to advancing the collective good which you would not directly benefit as an organization but committed to doing it anyway?

 
Let us analyze; if you answer 4 out of 4, then it means that you understand the importance of honesty, candor, and exhibiting a certain level of vulnerability to achieve common goals, that at some point, will cause discomfort or pain to your organization. If you answer yes to 2-3 questions, you have a certain level of understanding of your role but not taking a proactive stance to the issues you are facing as part of the group. If you answer yes to 1, there is a great room to improve in your standing and perception of how collaboration works,  gravitating on passivity, dependency, or confusion within your role in the group and vice versa.


Unraveling these issues is the start of empowering your position within a collaboration framework. It does not mean that you will not fail, it means that you can go back up again and revisit those thorny issues that get in the way of effective teaming up for success. The right frame of mind, expectations, and contributing attitude can set your organization up for greater collective impact.

If you're interested to deep dive into your strategy, change, and engagement issues, reach out to me at engage@globalstakesconsulting.com. Don't wait for the perfect time, situation, or budget.
0 Comments
Read More



Leave a Reply.


​Services

​Virtual/In-person Strategy & Change Support
Multi-stakeholder Engagement
Executive Group and Individual Mentoring
​Keynote, Training, & Facilitation 

    E-NEWSLETTER
    ​Free events, discounts, insights & updates you can use
    . No spam. 
    ​

Subscribe

Contact     About     Resources

​

​
​©2023 GlobalStakes Consulting
Photos used under Creative Commons from Sue90ca MORE OFF THAN ON, focusonmore.com, classroomcamera, hang_in_there, Rosmarie Voegtli, focusonmore.com, costantino.beretta, Ian Sane, Sue90ca MORE OFF THAN ON, 50,000 photos incl private, wuestenigel, shixart1985, lux.musica.khaos, ACRM-Rehabilitation, Mr.TinMD, orca_bc, focusonmore.com, wwarby, Dean Hochman, wbaiv, bjwhite66212, Renaud Camus, quariesofficial, Hervé S, France, paologmb, FutUndBeidl, wuestenigel, andressolo, vibrant_art, Bennilover, wuestenigel, irio.jyske, wuestenigel, ccPixs.com